RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

LCDT

Lucid Trading

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

LUCID TRADING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$81BETTER

MIN COST

—$90

0dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Lucid Trading PROS

+Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
+Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

−No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
−Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT