RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs FIXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
FXFY2
FIXIFY
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
METRIC
FIXIFY
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$250,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$81
MIN COST
—
0d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

FIXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Funded Futures Network PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
  • −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

FIXIFY PROS

  • +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
  • +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
  • +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
  • +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.

FIXIFY CONS

  • −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
  • −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
  • −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
FIXIFY
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Futures Network Full Review →FIXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy