RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs Fuze Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

FUZE

Fuze Traders

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

FUZE TRADERS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$81

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

FUZE TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Fuze Traders PROS

+A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
+No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
+The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
+Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.

Fuze Traders CONS

−No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
−Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
−Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT