RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
METRIC
FTMO
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER61/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$250,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$81BETTER
MIN COST
—$155
0dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
22%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

Funded Futures Network PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
  • −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
FTMO
Higher trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Futures Network Full Review →FTMO Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy