RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs Funded Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

FNDT

Funded Traders

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

FUNDED TRADERS

59/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$600,000

$81BETTER

MIN COST

—$489

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Funded Traders PROS

+Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
+Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
+News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
+Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
−Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT