RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

FNDF

FundedFast

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

FUNDEDFAST

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$81—

MIN COST

BETTER$49

0dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

FundedFast PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
+Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
+Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT