RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

ECLIPSE TRADING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$81

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT