RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs City Traders Imperium

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
City Traders Imperium
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
METRIC
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
59/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
58/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
3/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$250,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$4,000,000
$81BETTER
MIN COST
$129
0dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
25%
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

Funded Futures Network PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
  • Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

City Traders Imperium PROS

  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
  • +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
City Traders Imperium
Lower trust score (58/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Futures Network Full Review →City Traders Imperium Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy