RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Futures Network vs OneFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$250,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$81—
MIN COST
BETTER$59
0dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower
ONEFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto
Funded Futures Network PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
Funded Futures Network CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
- −Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.
OneFunded PROS
- +No time limits on eval
- +4 challenge tracks
- +Transparent rules
OneFunded CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
- −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context
PROPDNA VERDICT
Funded Futures Network
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy