RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Futures Family vs FXIFY
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FFAM
Funded Futures Family
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY
METRIC
FXIFY
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$32
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
15%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FXIFY DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, multi-asset, fast-payout
Funded Futures Family PROS
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
Funded Futures Family CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for Funded Futures Family, making meaningful comparison impossible.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown is likely expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
- −Traders cannot evaluate profit potential or risk parameters without any disclosed key metrics.
FXIFY PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
- +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
- +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.
FXIFY CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
- −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy