PropDNA
Search firms, traders…⌘K
Sign inTake the DNA Test →
Compare/Funderpro vs The Trading Pit
HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026

Funderpro vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
TRUST SCORE65/100BETTER63/100
PROFIT SPLIT80%TIE80%TIE
PAYOUT DAYS1dTIE1dTIE
MIN COST$79BETTER$99
MAX FUNDING$200,000$5,000,000BETTER
RATING4.23/54.33/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT5BETTER2
STEPS2-step2-step
DRAWDOWNFixedTrailing EOD

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
The Trading Pit
Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funderpro Full Review →The Trading Pit Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA
RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy