RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funderpro vs OneUp Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
OneUp Trader
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
FUNDERPRO
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
51/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$250,000
$79BETTER
MIN COST
$125
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES
futures, large-cap

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

OneUp Trader PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
OneUp Trader
Lower trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funderpro Full Review →OneUp Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy