RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funderpro vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
LCDT
Lucid Trading
FUNDERPRO
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
62/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$79BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funderpro Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy