RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funderpro vs FundedElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDRP

Funderpro

EST. 2023

FUNDE2

FundedElite

EST. 2023

FUNDERPRO

METRIC

FUNDEDELITE

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—58/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$79—

MIN COST

BETTER$39

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

FUNDEDELITE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader

Funderpro PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

FundedElite PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
+On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedElite CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro

Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FDRP