RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funderpro vs Funded Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDRP

Funderpro

EST. 2023

FNDT

Funded Traders

FUNDERPRO

METRIC

FUNDED TRADERS

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$600,000

$79BETTER

MIN COST

—$489

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

Funderpro PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

Funded Traders PROS

+Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
+Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
+News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
+Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
−Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro

Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FDRP