RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funderpro vs Eightcap Challenges

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDRP

Funderpro

EST. 2023

ECHT

Eightcap Challenges

FUNDERPRO

METRIC

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES

62/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$200,000

$79—

MIN COST

BETTER$5

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

Funderpro PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

Eightcap Challenges PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
+Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
−No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
−No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funderpro

Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FDRP