RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs Traders Launch

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC

Fidelcrest

TDLC

Traders Launch

FIDELCREST

METRIC

TRADERS LAUNCH

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER56/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER2.1/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Fidelcrest PROS

+Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Traders Launch PROS

+Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
+Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
+No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
+No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.

Traders Launch CONS

−Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
−Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
−Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FDLC