RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs MyFlashFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC

Fidelcrest

MFFL

MyFlashFunding

FIDELCREST

METRIC

MYFLASHFUNDING

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$15

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, Sway Charts

Fidelcrest PROS

+Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

MyFlashFunding PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.

MyFlashFunding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FDLC