RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs Lionheart Funding Program

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC

Fidelcrest

LHFP

Lionheart Funding Program

FIDELCREST

METRIC

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Fidelcrest PROS

+Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Lionheart Funding Program PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, establishing a baseline presence for trader research
+No confirmed negative metrics due to absence of data
+Firm name suggests a defined brand identity in the prop space
+No restrictive conditions are confirmed from available data

Lionheart Funding Program CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed comparison without any measurable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT