RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC
Fidelcrest
For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
FIDELCREST
METRIC
FOR TRADERS
40/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER58/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
MIN COST
$42
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

Fidelcrest PROS

  • +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

  • No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
  • Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.
For Traders
Higher trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fidelcrest Full Review →For Traders Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy