RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC
Fidelcrest
DPFD
DPFunded
FIDELCREST
METRIC
DPFUNDED
40/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE40/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
MIN COST
$58
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Commodities, Indices

Fidelcrest PROS

  • +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

  • No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
  • Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

DPFunded PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest
Higher trust score (40/100). Faster payouts at —d.
DPFunded
Higher trust score (40/100). Faster payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fidelcrest Full Review →DPFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy