RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC
Fidelcrest
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
FIDELCREST
METRIC
BULENOX
40/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER57/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4.29/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
MIN COST
$99
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

Fidelcrest PROS

  • +Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
  • +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

  • No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
  • Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
  • Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Bulenox
Higher trust score (57/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fidelcrest Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy