RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC

Fidelcrest

BLGD

Blue Guardian

FIDELCREST

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER55/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Fidelcrest PROS

+Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FDLC