RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fidelcrest vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FDLC

Fidelcrest

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

FIDELCREST

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4.29/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

100%

—

MAX FUNDING

$450,000

—

MIN COST

$84

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

FIDELCREST DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Fidelcrest PROS

+Cyprus is an EU-regulated jurisdiction, offering traders a degree of regulatory oversight and protection
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Fidelcrest CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fidelcrest

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FDLC