RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Elite Trader Funding
ELTF
Elite Trader Funding
EST. 2021
Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
ELITE TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
TOPSTEP
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
66/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
$150
MIN COST
BETTER$49
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
PASS RATE
28%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures, large-cap

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

Elite Trader Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding
Higher trust score (74/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Topstep
Lower trust score (66/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Elite Trader Funding Full Review →Topstep Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy