RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ELTF

Elite Trader Funding

EST. 2021

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

ELITE TRADER FUNDING

METRIC

SAVIUS

74/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$300,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$300,000

$150BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES: futures, large-cap

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Elite Trader Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding

Higher trust score (74/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ELTF