RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs Monevis

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Elite Trader Funding
ELTF
Elite Trader Funding
EST. 2021
Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
ELITE TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
MONEVIS
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
68/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER85%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$150
MIN COST
BETTER$49
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures, large-cap

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

Elite Trader Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding
Higher trust score (74/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Monevis
Lower trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Elite Trader Funding Full Review →Monevis Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy