RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs ICFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Elite Trader Funding
ELTF
Elite Trader Funding
EST. 2021
ICFD
ICFunded
ELITE TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
ICFUNDED
53/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER56/100
3.5/5
RATING
BETTER4.4/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$500,000
$150
MIN COST
BETTER$74
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
PASS RATE
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures, large-cap

ICFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
static
MARKETS
forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto
PLATFORMS
mt5
TYPES
forex, futures

Elite Trader Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

ICFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $74 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry costs.
  • +Profit split of 80% is provided with bi-weekly payouts, offering regular income access.
  • +Static drawdown type provides clear, fixed risk boundaries for traders to plan around.
  • +Markets include forex, indices, metals, commodities, and crypto, offering reasonable diversification.

ICFunded CONS

  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting upside potential.
  • Key data including days to first payout, profit target, drawdown percentage, and trading condition rules are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Only MT5 is listed as a platform, offering less choice than most competitors with multiple platform options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding
Lower trust score (53/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
ICFunded
Higher trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Elite Trader Funding Full Review →ICFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy