RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs Glow Node

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ELTF

Elite Trader Funding

EST. 2021

GLWN

Glow Node

ELITE TRADER FUNDING

METRIC

GLOW NODE

74/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$150

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES: futures, large-cap

GLOW NODE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase

Elite Trader Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

Glow Node PROS

+Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction offering trader protections
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

Glow Node CONS

−Steps to funded is 2, matching the industry average of 1.6 but not below it
−No profit split, funding cap, or payout data is available for comparison
−Limited data makes it impossible to fully evaluate this firm against industry benchmarks

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding

Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ELTF