RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Elite Trader Funding vs Blue Guardian Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ELTF
Elite Trader Funding
EST. 2021
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
ELITE TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
74/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$450,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$84
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER5d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
Elite Trader Funding PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
- +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
Elite Trader Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.
Blue Guardian Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
- +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
Blue Guardian Futures CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
- −Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
- −Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes
PROPDNA VERDICT
Elite Trader Funding
Higher trust score (74/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy