RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Elite Trader Funding vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ELTF

Elite Trader Funding

EST. 2021

AQFT

AquaFutures

ELITE TRADER FUNDING

METRIC

AQUAFUTURES

53/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—43/100

3.5/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$150

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

ELITE TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES: futures, large-cap

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Elite Trader Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps to get funded.
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the entry barrier.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering strong flexibility for diverse strategies.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

Elite Trader Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders keep less of their earnings.
−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, slowing cash flow.

AquaFutures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
+Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
+Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
+The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
−Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
−Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Elite Trader Funding

Higher trust score (53/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ELTF