RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Eagle Seven vs Aqua Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
EG7N
Eagle Seven
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
EAGLE SEVEN
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
45/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$1
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
EAGLE SEVEN DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Eagle Seven PROS
- +Country of operation is listed as the United States, indicating a regulated jurisdiction.
- +A registered tag suggests some formal industry presence.
- +No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
- +Listing on a comparison platform indicates an intent toward transparency.
Eagle Seven CONS
- −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
- −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no comparison to industry averages is possible.
- −Traders cannot assess payout speed, drawdown rules, or profit targets from available data.
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
- −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy