RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs Quadeye

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
QDEY
Quadeye
ECLIPSE TRADING
METRIC
QUADEYE
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

Quadeye PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

  • No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
  • India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
  • Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.
Quadeye
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Eclipse Trading Full Review →Quadeye Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy