RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs OspreyFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
OSPX
OspreyFX
ECLIPSE TRADING
METRIC
OSPREYFX
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
—
—
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
—
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

OSPREYFX DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

OspreyFX PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

OspreyFX CONS

  • −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any meaningful comparison to industry averages
  • −Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a low-regulation jurisdiction, raising oversight concerns
  • −Absence of profit split, funding cap, or payout data limits trader due diligence

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.
OspreyFX
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Eclipse Trading Full Review →OspreyFX Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy