RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
ECLIPSE TRADING
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$200
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Lark Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Eclipse Trading Full Review →Lark Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy