RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs Lionheart Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
LHFT
Lionheart Funding
ECLIPSE TRADING
METRIC
LIONHEART FUNDING
43/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
41/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
1.57/5
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

Lionheart Funding PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

Lionheart Funding CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
  • Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading
Higher trust score (43/100). Faster payouts at —d.
Lionheart Funding
Lower trust score (41/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Eclipse Trading Full Review →Lionheart Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy