RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
FNDF
FundedFast
ECLIPSE TRADING
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FundedFast
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Eclipse Trading Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy