RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eclipse Trading vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

AUDC

Audacity Capital

EST. 2012

ECLIPSE TRADING

METRIC

AUDACITY CAPITAL

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$2,000,000

—

MIN COST

$42

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

Audacity Capital PROS

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
+Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

−Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
−Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eclipse Trading

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH ECLT