RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eightcap Challenges vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
TFTR
The Funded Trader
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$5BETTER
MIN COST
$489
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

Eightcap Challenges PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
  • +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
  • No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
  • No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

The Funded Trader PROS

  • +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
  • +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
  • +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
  • Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eightcap Challenges
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
The Funded Trader
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Eightcap Challenges Full Review →The Funded Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy