RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Eightcap Challenges vs QT Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
QT FUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER64/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$5BETTER
MIN COST
—$12
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, MT4
QT FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker
Eightcap Challenges PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
- +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.
Eightcap Challenges CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
- −No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
- −No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.
QT Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.
QT Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
- −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Eightcap Challenges
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy