RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eightcap Challenges vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
QT FUNDED
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER64/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$5BETTER
MIN COST
$12
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Eightcap Challenges PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
  • +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
  • No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
  • No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eightcap Challenges
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
QT Funded
Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Eightcap Challenges Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy