RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eightcap Challenges vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER40/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$5
MIN COST
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Eightcap Challenges PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
  • +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
  • No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
  • No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eightcap Challenges
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
Pip Traders Funding
Higher trust score (40/100). Faster payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Eightcap Challenges Full Review →Pip Traders Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy