RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Eightcap Challenges vs Lark Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$5BETTER
MIN COST
—$200
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, MT4
LARK FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Eightcap Challenges PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
- +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.
Eightcap Challenges CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
- −No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
- −No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.
Lark Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.
Lark Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Eightcap Challenges
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy