RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Eightcap Challenges vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
Apex Trader Funding
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
METRIC
APEX TRADER FUNDING
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER2.75/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$5BETTER
MIN COST
$35
PAYOUT DAYS
8d
PASS RATE
31%
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, large-cap

Eightcap Challenges PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
  • +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
  • No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
  • No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

Apex Trader Funding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

  • Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
  • Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Eightcap Challenges
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 90% profit split.
Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Eightcap Challenges Full Review →Apex Trader Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy