RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Markets vs Mako Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8 Markets
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
MKOT
Mako Trading
E8 MARKETS
METRIC
MAKO TRADING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$58
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

MAKO TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

E8 Markets PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
  • −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

Mako Trading PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Mako Trading CONS

  • −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Markets
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Mako Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

E8 Markets Full Review →Mako Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy