RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
E8 Markets vs Liquid Capital Group
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
LQCG
Liquid Capital Group
E8 MARKETS
METRIC
LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$58
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
Liquid Capital Group PROS
- +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
- +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
- +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
- +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm
Liquid Capital Group CONS
- −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
- −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy