HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
E8 Markets vs Goat Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | E8 Markets EST. 2021 | Goat Funded EST. 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 67/100BETTER | 63/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 80%TIE | 80%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 3d | 2dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $58 | $49BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $1,000,000BETTER | $400,000 |
| RATING | 4.73/5BETTER | 3.56/5 |
| REVIEW COUNT | 4TIE | 4TIE |
| STEPS | 2-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing EOD | Fixed |
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
GOAT FUNDED DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- TradeLocker, MT5
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
Goat Funded PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
Goat Funded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, though it also provides more buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
