RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
E8 Markets vs Genk Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
E8 MARKETS
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$58
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
GENK CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
Genk Capital PROS
- +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
- +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
- +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
- +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.
Genk Capital CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
- −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
- −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy