RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
E8 Markets vs For Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
E8 MARKETS
METRIC
FOR TRADERS
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—65/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$1,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$58—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
3d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER2d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
FOR TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
For Traders PROS
- +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
For Traders CONS
- −Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
- −News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy