RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Markets vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8MK

E8 Markets

EST. 2021

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

E8 MARKETS

METRIC

ECLIPSE TRADING

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$1,000,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$58

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

E8 Markets PROS

+Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
+Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

−Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
−Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Markets

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E8MK