RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Markets vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8MK

E8 Markets

EST. 2021

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

E8 MARKETS

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—54/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$1,000,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$58—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

3dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

E8 Markets PROS

+Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
+Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

−Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
−Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Markets

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E8MK